Better Perl

[Zbigniew Lukasiak]

Is it possible to discuss Better Perl without falling into discussion
if Perl is doing well?  I mean I do understand that the data can be
read both ways - and that it is not entirely convincing - and that
there are people unconvinced who will stay unconvinced.  But clearly
there are people who do think that Perl needs some improvements
(perhaps some new PR/marketing strategy) - so my question is if those
people can discuss that matter at this general list - or if such a
discussion would be too harmful for those that don't agree with that
thesis?

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Jonathan Tweed <jonathan at tweed.name> wrote:
> On 4 Apr 2008, at 11:16, Abigail <abigail at abigail.be> wrote:
>
>
> > All I said that Perls survival doesn't depend on whether or not people
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > think you can build (large) core systems with them.
> >
>
>  Survive, or survive as a language people will pay you to build large
> systems in?
>
>  Cheers
>  Jonathan
>



-- 
Zbigniew Lukasiak
http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/