Recruiter spam

[paddy@panici.net]

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 04:02:18PM +0100, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
> Matt Jones wrote:
>>> I wouldn't classify that as spam, as it's not really been sent in bulk
>>> without regard for who the recipient is.
>>>     
>>
>> I duuno about that. Unsolicited? Check. Commercial? Check. Email?
>> Check. Ergo: spam.
>>   
>
> That acid test for spam or unsolicited mail is whether the sender is  
> trying to disguise their identity and the origin of the email or not..   

huh?  Which part of unsolicited are you having a problem with ?

Regards,
Paddy