virtuallysue at gmail.com
Fri Jul 18 10:41:34 BST 2008
Matt Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:29 AM, James Laver <james.laver at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 17/7/08 06:29, "Sagar R. Shah" <sagsshah at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> If u're only processing a small set of data that'd probably be the way to go,
>> Please try to use correct English. Perfection is not required, but "u're" is
>> unacceptable to most people.
> Yes, thank you, it's "u r", as any fule kno.
Indeed. Why just you -> u? The contraction was otherwise impeccable, save for the funky word->letter
substitution. Why not just go for it and get really creative.
More information about the london.pm