Perl's lack of 'in' keyword

[Paul Makepeace]

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Nigel Metheringham
<nigel.metheringham at dev.intechnology.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On 8 Oct 2008, at 14:51, Nigel Rantor <wiggly at wiggly.org> wrote:
>
>> If anyone comes back and tell me that they think ~~ scans nicely in
>> english
>
>
> Considering your email address I would have thought you would be very
> much in favour of ~~ and have a good way of pronouncing it....

OMG ROFL!

If this operator doesn't have a well-established way of being
pronounced I think it ought to have this one!