Perl's lack of 'in' keyword

Paul Makepeace paulm at
Wed Oct 8 15:36:18 BST 2008

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Nigel Metheringham
<nigel.metheringham at> wrote:
> On 8 Oct 2008, at 14:51, Nigel Rantor <wiggly at> wrote:
>> If anyone comes back and tell me that they think ~~ scans nicely in
>> english
> Considering your email address I would have thought you would be very
> much in favour of ~~ and have a good way of pronouncing it....


If this operator doesn't have a well-established way of being
pronounced I think it ought to have this one!

More information about the mailing list