Duh v D'oh
edencardim at gmail.com
Fri Nov 7 18:10:05 GMT 2008
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Paul Makepeace <paulm at paulm.com> wrote:
> I don't think that's so exciting that this equivalent isn't acceptable in
> its stead,
> config = default
> I think I prefer the slightly more explicit nature of this way , even.
Well, the way I see it, "for k in my_dict" is also implicit, and since
you've manifested your preference of that construct over the explicit
"for keys %dict", in favour of readability, it is now clear that YMMV
in regard to explicitness.
> Would be interesting exercise to compare/contrast these perl idioms and
> their Language X equivalents and see where perl really shines, or not.
Yes, that'd be cool and instructive, since I haven't had the time to
dig in to things like Python and Ruby. I'll confess that my vision of
Perl practicity might be clouded by the previous C, C++ and Java
Eden Cardim Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project?
Code Monkey http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/catalyst/
Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Want a managed development or deployment platform?
More information about the london.pm