Perl is dead

[Dave Cross]

Simon Wilcox wrote:
> David Cantrell wrote:
>> And no, setting up yet another blog aggregator or yet another obscure
>> site that occasionally publishes an article, those don't count.
>> perlbuzz's existence hasn't fixed any problems.
> 
> So fixing use.perl is what we need to do. That will only happen with
> pudge's active involvement.
> 
> Does anyone know if he's interested in doing this ?

I think that pudge sees use.perl as a test-bed for Slashcode. And I
think that Slashcode is part of the problem here.

Does it have to be a fix for use.perl? Or could it be a replacement for
use.perl?

Dave...