Have at it
diment at gmail.com
Tue Jan 27 11:44:35 GMT 2009
This is important stuff. Here's my take:
On 27/01/2009, at 10:02 AM, Tomas Doran wrote:
> On 26 Jan 2009, at 17:26, Aaron Trevena wrote:
>> 2009/1/26 Denny <london.pm at metamathics.org>:
>>> Personally, I assumed he was referring to the strong 'use Moose'
>>> which EPO seems to be on - would it be safe to say that Moose is a
>>> modern approach to OO? I've not used it personally, and am looking
>>> forward to the tech meet around the subject.
>> I think MOP (meta object protocol) is a modern approach to OO, it's
>> found in Perl 6, Badger, Mouse (and mouse? ferret ? I lose track..)
> Neither Badger or Mouse have a 'proper' MOP.
> They both allow you to do _some_ level of meta-programming, but
> neither is a meta-object implementation.
More information about the london.pm