Beautiful is better than ugly
paulm at paulm.com
Wed Apr 22 12:56:47 BST 2009
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Abigail <abigail at abigail.be> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:20:03PM +0100, Simon Wilcox wrote:
>> On 22/4/09 11:09, Sue Spence wrote:
>>> 2009/4/22 Léon Brocard <acme at astray.com>:
>>>> Alias ranted: http://use.perl.org/~Alias/journal/38842
>>>> Which Perl website do you think looks the worst? Which has the worst navigation?
>>>> We managed to redesign london.pm.org. Is it time to do another?
>>> perl.org - hello, 1996
>> BTDT. Is this any better ?
> IMO. No. Not by a long shot. It's screamy, it hurts your eyes,
ITYM "it hurts my eyes"
> and doesn't invite you at all to stay long enough to even read
> the first words.
ITYM "it doesn't invite me at all"
FWIW, I really like it. Re 1996: Nothing says "stuck in the CGI era"
like a website from that particular era...
> But I guess I'm just too old to be a Perl user. ;-)
More information about the london.pm