Recommendation for simple Web Frameworks
szabgab at gmail.com
Tue Jan 11 08:26:19 GMT 2011
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:10 AM, John Imison <i at moe.co.uk> wrote:
> On 10/01/2011 10:29 PM, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
>>> Out of interest, does anyone use CGI::Application? What are the general
>>> thoughts on that?
>> As a dispatcher, it's fine. DBIC+TT+CGI::App is a framework :)
> Great. I'm glad to hear that some people on here are using it. I've been
> using DBIC+TT+CGI::App for a little while and found the learning curve to be
> small/fast and wanted to knock something up quickly.
> Most perl irc channels were recommending Catalyst, Dancer and Mojolicious as
> the main frameworks and I was worried that there may have been something
> wrong with CGI::App that I didn't know about. I guess the main difference
> is the 3 above are actively being developed?
I have been using CGI::Applications for many years. IMHO the biggest
it is its name. AFAIK it the development is not that active because
1) do not want it to be a big framework like Catalyst
2) find that it has been mature for several years now
Even though I do things happening on the mailing list here and there.
I am now playing with Dancer because it is a new toy and
it has a cooler name than CGI::Applications.
 That was part of the reason for the repackaging as Titanium
More information about the london.pm