Like Moose attributes, but not

Pedro Figueiredo me at
Sun May 22 19:08:12 BST 2011

On 22 May 2011, at 18:20, Simon Wistow <simon at> wrote:

> Is there anything out there that gives Moose style 'has' with type 
> constraints but without needing all the other functionality that Moose 
> provides?

Is Mouse too much?

More information about the mailing list