avleen at gmail.com
Fri Dec 9 05:26:33 GMT 2011
There a couple of NaP people on this list. I don't know if they can comment
That said, I agree with Kieren.
The simplest answer is usually correct. I know it doesn't make a difference
to you as you feel jerked around, but NaP likely spent a lot of time and
money interviewing people, working out logistics, planning. This wouldn't
have been free for them to do.
It feels pretty crappy to be in your position - believe me I've been there
more than once.
I quickly learned that if you're unemployed, the right thing to do is take
the first offer you get (or, the first good one if you can get a few in
around the same time). Deal with the consequences of that later - at least
you'll be eating and sleeping soundly.
That said, if you're looking for work in the US, and you know PHP (sorry
perl guys :) ), we're hiring at Etsy.
Drop me a mail off-list if you're interested. And we're definitely up front
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Rudolf Lippan <rlippan at remotelinux.com>wrote:
> Good morning, Perl Mongers,
> This is a followup to my post to the Perl jobs-discuss mailing list.
> Terrence picked it up here:
> http://livingcosmos.posterous.com/beware-of-net-a-porter-perl-jobs and
> the original can be found here:
> About six weeks ago, I was contacted by a recruiter and asked if I was
> interested in a team lead position in New Jersey, and so begins my story.
> I was wanting to get back into the community after a limiting contract,
> but this wasn't really the sort of splash I hoped to make. I've never been
> moved to do something like this in the 10+ years I've been programming
> professionally. I've experienced some less than honest recruiting
> techniques and companies that had no issue jerking people around, but I was
> made aware this morning that there were at least two other Perl programmers
> affected, including junior candidates that probably had more hanging on
> this than I did.
> I sent the following list of events to both NET-A-PORTER and the
> recruiting agency 7 Dec. Earlier today (8 Dec.), the recruiter called me
> and confirmed this, point by point. NET-A-PORTER has, as of yet, not
> 1) That NET-A-PORTER was fully aware of the contract rate during the
> 2) That NET-A-PORTER selected me to lead their US team and I was asked to
> for final sign off.
> 3) That NET-A-PORTER was aware that I let another opportunity go based on
> understanding that my employment was pending a 'final signature'.
> 4) That as a condition of final sign off NET-A-PORTER asked that, at the
> of the 6 month contract period, I would be willing to accept $30K less
> the original budgeted salary with the proviso that the salary would be
> to renegotiation based on the market conditions at that time.
> that I agreed to this.
> 5) That NET-A-PORTER decided to withdraw the position at this point and no
> longer build out a US-based Perl development team. The reason given is
> it would cost 1/2 as much to build out a team in the UK.
> For a company that espouses their programming culture and community
> support, I can't understand how they could think this was even remotely
> acceptable. If anyone has any questions, please feel free to contact me.
> The recruiter gave permission to share contact information with any
> interested parties regarding this situation.
> I know I'm not in the UK but, short of trying for slashdot, I thought this
> was the most appropriate venue for informing those who should be most aware
> of their actions.
More information about the london.pm