Does anyone know a London Based Devops Engineer/Manager ? if you recommend someone and I place them - ill but two tickets to Paris on the Eurostar !!
Rick Deller
rick at eligo.co.uk
Fri Aug 31 10:21:29 BST 2012
A brief overview of what they are looking for
If so My client is world renowned corporate-owned multi million pound web brand. They have developed a unique product which has revolutionised the sector in which they work for the past 5 years. As a software company they require the best and are recruiting a DevOps Manager who will sit in the large Perl Development team.
Requirements
. You will have experience building large applications in multiple languages.
. You will understand the basics: Linux, security, virtualisation, HTTP, and web service architecture.
. You will need a good understanding of hardware and networking but those aspects will be the primary responsibility for someone else.
. You're familiar with message queues, relational databases, and other data stores.
. You will Work on the dev team with a Dev/Ops focus. Improve and expand their existing deployments and infrastructure.
. Help the team write the software that scales well and takes best advantage of the infrastructure
. Have experience in working in a full agile environment
Kindest Regards
Rick
Rick Deller
Technical / Digital Recruitment Consultant
Perl, Java & Search Marketing
DL: 0207 384 9907 | MOB: 07725984595 | SW: 02073849900
Suites 24 & 25 Hurlingham Studios, Ranelagh Gardens, Fulham, SW6 3PA
Follow Eligo Digital on Twitter at https://twitter.com/#!/EligoDigital
"Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail"
CLIENT NOTICE - By accepting details of, interviewing or engaging an applicant introduced by us in the position offered or any other position, the client is agreeing to be bound by our standard Terms of Business unless otherwise agreed in writing.
DISCLAIMER NOTICE - The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended only for the named addressee(s) and may not be disclosed to anyone else without the consent of Eligo Recruitment Ltd. If you are not the named addressee you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on the contents of the e-mail and should destroy it immediately.
Eligo Recruitment Ltd has taken every reasonable precaution to ensure that any attachment to this e-mail is free of all known viruses. However, Eligo Recruitment Ltd cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses and would advise that you carry out your own virus scanning.
-----Original Message-----
From: london.pm-bounces at london.pm.org [mailto:london.pm-bounces at london.pm.org] On Behalf Of london.pm-request at london.pm.org
Sent: 31 August 2012 10:08
To: london.pm at london.pm.org
Subject: london.pm Digest, Vol 82, Issue 24
Send london.pm mailing list submissions to
london.pm at london.pm.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://london.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/london.pm
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
london.pm-request at london.pm.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
london.pm-owner at london.pm.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of london.pm digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Which sucks least? Sky, Talktalk to BT broadband?
(Andrew Beattie)
2. Re: Which sucks least? Sky, Talktalk to BT broadband?
(Mike Whitaker)
3. Re: Which sucks least? Sky, Talktalk to BT broadband?
(Yan Fitterer)
4. Who made the law? (Dave Hodgkinson)
5. Re: Who made the law? (Ash Berlin)
6. Re: Who made the law? (Mark Fowler)
7. Re: Who made the law? (Leo Lapworth)
8. Re: Who made the law? (Dave Cross)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:42:53 +0100
From: Andrew Beattie <andrew at tug.com>
Subject: Re: Which sucks least? Sky, Talktalk to BT broadband?
To: "London.pm Perl M\[ou\]ngers" <london.pm at london.pm.org>
Message-ID: <6DE80083-90F4-4836-82C5-4FD9CFA66D7F at tug.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
On 30 Aug 2012, at 10:57, William Blunn <bill+london.pm at blunn.org> wrote:
> If you want a "technical" style service, you could go for AAISP
I might go with them just on the strength of their website. I just looked at http://www.aa.net.uk/broadband.html and found them talking about ADSL1, ADSL2+, FTTC, FTTP, LLU and BT back-haul. What a breath of fresh air!
Andrew
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:49:17 +0100
From: Mike Whitaker <mike at altrion.org>
Subject: Re: Which sucks least? Sky, Talktalk to BT broadband?
To: "London.pm Perl M\[ou\]ngers" <london.pm at london.pm.org>
Message-ID: <AA92B9D9-576F-482F-99E1-38859113456D at altrion.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
On 30 Aug 2012, at 13:42, Andrew Beattie <andrew at tug.com> wrote:
>
> On 30 Aug 2012, at 10:57, William Blunn <bill+london.pm at blunn.org> wrote:
>> If you want a "technical" style service, you could go for AAISP
>
> I might go with them just on the strength of their website. I just looked at http://www.aa.net.uk/broadband.html and found them talking about ADSL1, ADSL2+, FTTC, FTTP, LLU and BT back-haul. What a breath of fresh air!
Speaking as a satisfied customer, you could do a lot worse. Also, their support staff have clues, rather than scripts, and their support-over-irc is pretty decent.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:34:37 +0900
From: Yan Fitterer <yan at fitterer.org>
Subject: Re: Which sucks least? Sky, Talktalk to BT broadband?
To: "London.pm Perl M[ou]ngers" <london.pm at london.pm.org>
Cc: "London.pm Perl M[ou]ngers" <london.pm at london.pm.org>
Message-ID: <77741BE6-F66D-425D-B9A2-F2466EEA4812 at fitterer.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I'm with them. No issues. You can configure pretty much everything from their web systems. Only drawback IMHO: support during office hours only.
Not that I've ever actually needed it...
oh- and price: they were not cheap last I checked.
But they remain the only ISP that ever picked the phone (a long time ago) to enquire if all was well when I was doing some work in the house, and the line kept going up and down.
Sent from my iPhone
On 30 Aug 2012, at 21:42, Andrew Beattie <andrew at tug.com> wrote:
>
> On 30 Aug 2012, at 10:57, William Blunn <bill+london.pm at blunn.org> wrote:
>> If you want a "technical" style service, you could go for AAISP
>
> I might go with them just on the strength of their website. I just looked at http://www.aa.net.uk/broadband.html and found them talking about ADSL1, ADSL2+, FTTC, FTTP, LLU and BT back-haul. What a breath of fresh air!
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:47:47 +0100
From: Dave Hodgkinson <davehodg at gmail.com>
Subject: Who made the law?
To: "London. pm Perl M[ou]ngers" <london.pm at london.pm.org>
Message-ID: <F7DA0FF7-2EEA-4A84-AB17-26003F7EA8BC at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Where is the usage policy of #london.pm IRC channel.
At least two people got kicked today, one for what has been traditional banter for the last ten years, and another for questioning that kick.
Without agreed guidelines this is arbitrary.
Is this what we do these days?
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:14:35 +0100
From: Ash Berlin <ash_cpan at firemirror.com>
Subject: Re: Who made the law?
To: "London.pm Perl M\[ou\]ngers" <london.pm at london.pm.org>
Message-ID: <AA0911B0-66BF-4C1F-B811-EFFC133D21ED at firemirror.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On 30 Aug 2012, at 18:47, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
>
> Where is the usage policy of #london.pm IRC channel.
>
> At least two people got kicked today, one for what has been
> traditional banter for the last ten years, and another for questioning that kick.
>
> Without agreed guidelines this is arbitrary.
>
> Is this what we do these days?
>
>
This is always what we have done.
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:28:27 -0400
From: Mark Fowler <mark at twoshortplanks.com>
Subject: Re: Who made the law?
To: " London.pm Perl M[ou]ngers " <london.pm at london.pm.org>
Message-ID: <A854F3A4B8F042668360AED9BA27ECA0 at twoshortplanks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On Thursday, 30 August 2012 at 14:14, Ash Berlin wrote:
> On 30 Aug 2012, at 18:47, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
> > Where is the usage policy of #london.pm IRC channel.
>
We don't have one. We should have one. And not just for irc, but for the mailing lists and for real live events. Here, let me write one (or at least steal one.)
Here's the nutshell version, stolen from Tim O'Reilly, which was stolen from Flickr.
Don?t be creepy. You know the guy. Don't be that guy.
Here's my longer drawn out version, stolen from YAPC::NA's code of conduct. Comments on this are genuinely welcome, and I'll leave it to the current London.pm leader to make a call on what exactly we should adopt (if anything)
Code of Conduct
1. Purpose
London.pm believes our community should be truly open for everyone. As such, we are committed to providing a friendly, safe and welcoming environment for all, regardless of gender, sexual orientation, disability, ethnicity, religion, preferred operating system, programming language, or text editor.
This code of conduct outlines our expectations for participant behavior as well as the consequences for unacceptable behavior.
We invite all posters to the mailing list, members of the irc channels, event attendees, London.pm t-shirt wearers and other participants in the London.pm community to help us realise a safe and positive experience for everyone.
2. Expected Behavior
Be considerate, respectful, and collaborative.
Refrain from demeaning, discriminatory or harassing behavior, speech, and electronic communication. Be aware that what may be mild banter to you might be perceived as demeaning, discriminatory or harassing behavior to other members or potential members of the wider London.pm community.
Be mindful of your surroundings and of your fellow participants. Alert the London.pm leaders (part or present,) or event organisers if you notice a dangerous situation or someone in distress.
Participate in an authentic and active way. In doing so, you help to improve the London.pm community.
3. Unacceptable Behavior
Unacceptable behaviors include: intimidating, harassing, abusive, discriminatory, derogatory or demeaning conduct on the mailing lists, irc channels and while attending London.pm events and related events. Be aware London.pm venues may be shared with members of the public; please be respectful to all patrons of these locations. Be aware that electronic communications are effectively archived forever and are accessible to the public and therefore become the "public face" of London.pm.
Harassment includes: offensive verbal comments related to gender, sexual orientation, race, religion, disability; inappropriate use of nudity and/or sexual images in public spaces (including presentation slides); deliberate intimidation, stalking or following; harassing photography or recording; sustained disruption of talks or other events; inappropriate physical contact, and unwelcome sexual attention.
4. Consequences of Unacceptable Behavior
Unacceptable behavior will not be tolerated by anyone associated with the London.pm community.
Anyone asked to stop unacceptable behavior is expected to comply immediately.
If a participant engages in unacceptable behavior, the London.pm leaders (past and present,) event organisers, or any person delegated responsibility by the aforementioned may take any action they deem appropriate, up to and including permanent expulsion from the event, mailing list or irc channel.
5. What to do if you witness or are subject to unacceptable behavior
If you are subject to unacceptable behavior, notice that someone else is being subject to unacceptable behavior, or have any other concerns, please notify a London.pm leader (past or present,) event organiser, or any person delegated to handle this task by the aforementioned as soon as possible.
These people will be available to help participants contact law enforcement, and in the case of in-person events contact venue security, to provide escorts, or to otherwise assist those experiencing unacceptable behavior to feel safe for the duration of the event.
Members of the London.pm community are encouraged to bring these matters to the attention of the London.pm leaders, event organisers, and delegated representatives rather then dealing with issues solely themselves so matters can be dealt with properly in a manner that does not expose those members to accusations of personal vendettas. Issues of harassment are important, and as such we are keen that issues are seen to be dealt with at a community wide level.
6. Scope
We expect all people participating in the London.pm community, be it in person or through electronic communication, to abide by this code of conduct whenever they participate in the London.pm community.
7. Contact info
leader at london.pm.org
8. License and attribution
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Adapted from the YAPC::NA community guidelines which can be found at http://yapcna.org/conference/code-of-conduct
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 21:46:23 +0100
From: Leo Lapworth <leo at cuckoo.org>
Subject: Re: Who made the law?
To: "London.pm Perl M[ou]ngers" <london.pm at london.pm.org>
Message-ID:
<CA+rMUP4YL5uOrYVYcuOOF2uEG_61rv2o9RMmSuEyRyNmVfoM3w at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
On 30 August 2012 21:28, Mark Fowler <mark at twoshortplanks.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, 30 August 2012 at 14:14, Ash Berlin wrote:
> > On 30 Aug 2012, at 18:47, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
> > > Where is the usage policy of #london.pm IRC channel.
> >
>
> We don't have one. We should have one. And not just for irc, but for
> the mailing lists and for real live events. Here, let me write one
> (or at least steal one.)
>
> Here's the nutshell version, stolen from Tim O'Reilly, which was
> stolen from Flickr.
>
> Don?t be creepy. You know the guy. Don't be that guy.
>
> Here's my longer drawn out version, stolen from YAPC::NA's code of
> conduct. Comments on this are genuinely welcome, and I'll leave it to
> the current London.pm leader to make a call on what exactly we should
> adopt (if
> anything)
>
> Code of Conduct
>
> 1. Purpose
>
> London.pm believes our community should be truly open for everyone. As
> such, we are committed to providing a friendly, safe and welcoming
> environment for all, regardless of gender, sexual orientation,
> disability, ethnicity, religion, preferred operating system,
> programming language, or text editor.
>
> This code of conduct outlines our expectations for participant
> behavior as well as the consequences for unacceptable behavior.
>
> We invite all posters to the mailing list, members of the irc
> channels, event attendees, London.pm t-shirt wearers and other
> participants in the London.pm community to help us realise a safe and
> positive experience for everyone.
>
> 2. Expected Behavior
>
> Be considerate, respectful, and collaborative.
>
> Refrain from demeaning, discriminatory or harassing behavior, speech,
> and electronic communication. Be aware that what may be mild banter to
> you might be perceived as demeaning, discriminatory or harassing
> behavior to other members or potential members of the wider London.pm
> community.
>
> Be mindful of your surroundings and of your fellow participants. Alert
> the London.pm leaders (part or present,) or event organisers if you
> notice a dangerous situation or someone in distress.
>
> Participate in an authentic and active way. In doing so, you help to
> improve the London.pm community.
>
> 3. Unacceptable Behavior
>
> Unacceptable behaviors include: intimidating, harassing, abusive,
> discriminatory, derogatory or demeaning conduct on the mailing lists,
> irc channels and while attending London.pm events and related events.
> Be aware London.pm venues may be shared with members of the public;
> please be respectful to all patrons of these locations. Be aware that
> electronic communications are effectively archived forever and are
> accessible to the public and therefore become the "public face" of
> London.pm.
>
> Harassment includes: offensive verbal comments related to gender,
> sexual orientation, race, religion, disability; inappropriate use of
> nudity and/or sexual images in public spaces (including presentation
> slides); deliberate intimidation, stalking or following; harassing
> photography or recording; sustained disruption of talks or other
> events; inappropriate physical contact, and unwelcome sexual
> attention.
>
> 4. Consequences of Unacceptable Behavior
>
> Unacceptable behavior will not be tolerated by anyone associated with
> the London.pm community.
>
> Anyone asked to stop unacceptable behavior is expected to comply
> immediately.
> If a participant engages in unacceptable behavior, the London.pm
> leaders (past and present,) event organisers, or any person delegated
> responsibility by the aforementioned may take any action they deem
> appropriate, up to and including permanent expulsion from the event,
> mailing list or irc channel.
>
> 5. What to do if you witness or are subject to unacceptable behavior
>
> If you are subject to unacceptable behavior, notice that someone else
> is being subject to unacceptable behavior, or have any other concerns,
> please notify a London.pm leader (past or present,) event organiser,
> or any person delegated to handle this task by the aforementioned as
> soon as possible.
>
> These people will be available to help participants contact law
> enforcement, and in the case of in-person events contact venue
> security, to provide escorts, or to otherwise assist those
> experiencing unacceptable behavior to feel safe for the duration of
> the event.
>
> Members of the London.pm community are encouraged to bring these
> matters to the attention of the London.pm leaders, event organisers,
> and delegated representatives rather then dealing with issues solely
> themselves so matters can be dealt with properly in a manner that does
> not expose those members to accusations of personal vendettas. Issues
> of harassment are important, and as such we are keen that issues are
> seen to be dealt with at a community wide level.
>
> 6. Scope
>
> We expect all people participating in the London.pm community, be it
> in person or through electronic communication, to abide by this code
> of conduct whenever they participate in the London.pm community.
>
> 7. Contact info
>
> leader at london.pm.org
>
> 8. License and attribution
>
> Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike
> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
>
> Adapted from the YAPC::NA community guidelines which can be found at
> http://yapcna.org/conference/code-of-conduct
+1
Other than:
"London.pm leaders (part or present,)" should be "London.pm leaders (past or present)"
Again up to current leader - as London.pm is not and never has been a democracy.
Leo ( ex-leader )
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:23:48 +0100
From: Dave Cross <dave at dave.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Who made the law?
To: london.pm at london.pm.org
Message-ID: <20120831102348.10983a0zwr2ettwk at webmail.mag-sol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed"
Quoting Leo Lapworth <leo at cuckoo.org>:
> On 30 August 2012 21:28, Mark Fowler <mark at twoshortplanks.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, 30 August 2012 at 14:14, Ash Berlin wrote:
>> > On 30 Aug 2012, at 18:47, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
>> > > Where is the usage policy of #london.pm IRC channel.
>> >
>>
>> We don't have one. We should have one. And not just for irc, but
>> for the mailing lists and for real live events. Here, let me write
>> one (or at least steal one.)
>>
>> Here's the nutshell version, stolen from Tim O'Reilly, which was
>> stolen from Flickr.
>>
>> Don?t be creepy. You know the guy. Don't be that guy.
>>
>> Here's my longer drawn out version, stolen from YAPC::NA's code of
>> conduct. Comments on this are genuinely welcome, and I'll leave it
>> to the current London.pm leader to make a call on what exactly we
>> should adopt (if
>> anything)
>>
>> Code of Conduct
>>
>> 1. Purpose
>>
>> London.pm believes our community should be truly open for everyone.
>> As such, we are committed to providing a friendly, safe and welcoming
>> environment for all, regardless of gender, sexual orientation,
>> disability, ethnicity, religion,preferred operating system,
>> programming language, or text editor.
>>
>> This code of conduct outlines our expectations for participant
>> behavior as well as the consequences for unacceptable behavior.
>>
>> We invite all posters to the mailing list, members of the irc
>> channels, event attendees, London.pm t-shirt wearers and other
>> participants in the London.pm community to help us realise a safe and
>> positive experience for everyone.
>>
>> 2. Expected Behavior
>>
>> Be considerate, respectful, and collaborative.
>>
>> Refrain from demeaning, discriminatory or harassing behavior, speech,
>> and electronic communication. Be aware that what may be mild banter
>> to you might be perceived as demeaning, discriminatory or harassing
>> behavior to other members or potential members of the wider London.pm
>> community.
>>
>> Be mindful of your surroundings and of your fellow participants.
>> Alert the London.pm leaders (part or present,) or event organisers if
>> you notice a dangerous situation or someone in distress.
>>
>> Participate in an authentic and active way. In doing so, you help to
>> improve the London.pm community.
>>
>> 3. Unacceptable Behavior
>>
>> Unacceptable behaviors include: intimidating, harassing, abusive,
>> discriminatory, derogatory or demeaning conduct on the mailing lists,
>> irc channels and while attending London.pm events and related events.
>> Be aware London.pm venues may be shared with members of the public;
>> please be respectful to all patrons of these locations. Be aware that
>> electronic communications are effectively archived forever and are
>> accessible to the public and therefore become the "public face" of
>> London.pm.
>>
>> Harassment includes: offensive verbal comments related to gender,
>> sexual orientation, race, religion, disability; inappropriate use of
>> nudity and/or sexual images in public spaces (including presentation
>> slides); deliberate intimidation, stalking or following; harassing
>> photography or recording; sustained disruption of talks or other
>> events; inappropriate physical contact, and unwelcome sexual attention.
>>
>> 4. Consequences of Unacceptable Behavior
>>
>> Unacceptable behavior will not be tolerated by anyone associated with
>> the London.pm community.
>>
>> Anyone asked to stop unacceptable behavior is expected to comply
>> immediately.
>> If a participant engages in unacceptable behavior, the London.pm
>> leaders (past and present,) event organisers, or any person delegated
>> responsibility by the aforementioned may take any action they deem
>> appropriate, up to and including permanent expulsion from the event,
>> mailing list or irc channel.
>>
>> 5. What to do if you witness or are subject to unacceptable behavior
>>
>> If you are subject to unacceptable behavior, notice that someone else
>> is being subject to unacceptable behavior, or have any other
>> concerns, please notify a London.pm leader (past or present,) event
>> organiser, or any person delegated to handle this task by the aforementioned as soon as possible.
>>
>> These people will be available to help participants contact law
>> enforcement, and in the case of in-person events contact venue
>> security, to >> provide escorts, or to otherwise assist those
>> experiencing unacceptable behavior to feel safe for the duration of
>> the event.
>>
>> Members of the London.pm community are encouraged to bring these
>> matters to the attention of the London.pm leaders, event organisers,
>> and delegated representatives rather then dealing with issues solely
>> themselves so matters can be dealt with properly in a manner that
>> does not expose those members to accusations of personal vendettas.
>> Issues of harassment are important, and as such we are keen that
>> issues are seen to be dealt with at a community wide level.
>>
>> 6. Scope
>>
>> We expect all people participating in the London.pm community, be it
>> in person or through electronic communication, to abide by this code
>> of conduct whenever they participate in the London.pm community.
>>
>> 7. Contact info
>>
>> leader at london.pm.org
>>
>> 8. License and attribution
>>
>> Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike
>> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
>>
>> Adapted from the YAPC::NA community guidelines which can be found at
>> http://yapcna.org/conference/code-of-conduct
>
>
> +1
>
> Other than:
>
> "London.pm leaders (part or present,)" should be "London.pm leaders
> (past or present)"
>
> Again up to current leader - as London.pm is not and never has been a
> democracy.
Also, the spelling of "behaviour" needs to be fixed throughout.
Otherwise, it would definitely get my vote. If we were voting. Which we're not.
Cheers,
Dave...
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
london.pm mailing list
london.pm at london.pm.org
http://london.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/london.pm
End of london.pm Digest, Vol 82, Issue 24
*****************************************
More information about the london.pm
mailing list