Can I get some advice on best way to start Perl Programming
rick at eligo.co.uk
Fri Aug 31 12:16:00 BST 2012
I have brought a couple of books on the subject which I'm reading through
I'm very keen to learn more and how to do it
Can anyone suggest more books or another way of doing it ?
Technical / Digital Recruitment Consultant
Perl, Java & Search Marketing
DL: 0207 384 9907 | MOB: 07725984595 | SW: 02073849900
Suites 24 & 25 Hurlingham Studios, Ranelagh Gardens, Fulham, SW6 3PA
Follow Eligo Digital on Twitter at https://twitter.com/#!/EligoDigital
"Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail"
CLIENT NOTICE - By accepting details of, interviewing or engaging an applicant introduced by us in the position offered or any other position, the client is agreeing to be bound by our standard Terms of Business unless otherwise agreed in writing.
DISCLAIMER NOTICE - The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended only for the named addressee(s) and may not be disclosed to anyone else without the consent of Eligo Recruitment Ltd. If you are not the named addressee you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on the contents of the e-mail and should destroy it immediately.
Eligo Recruitment Ltd has taken every reasonable precaution to ensure that any attachment to this e-mail is free of all known viruses. However, Eligo Recruitment Ltd cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses and would advise that you carry out your own virus scanning.
From: london.pm-bounces at london.pm.org [mailto:london.pm-bounces at london.pm.org] On Behalf Of london.pm-request at london.pm.org
Sent: 31 August 2012 12:00
To: london.pm at london.pm.org
Subject: london.pm Digest, Vol 82, Issue 27
Send london.pm mailing list submissions to
london.pm at london.pm.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
london.pm-request at london.pm.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
london.pm-owner at london.pm.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of london.pm digest..."
1. Re: Who made the law? (Mark Fowler)
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 06:54:12 -0400
From: Mark Fowler <mark at twoshortplanks.com>
Subject: Re: Who made the law?
To: " London.pm Perl M[ou]ngers " <london.pm at london.pm.org>
Message-ID: <988CD8B8588C4FC1BEDFAB14B70418E6 at twoshortplanks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On Thursday, 30 August 2012 at 16:28, Mark Fowler wrote:
> Here's my longer drawn out version,
I'm going to attempt to answer a whole bunch of questions on this in one go rather than spreading them out.
Q. Regarding the incident that Dave Hodgkinson mentioned?
This isn't a reaction to any incident, including this one, and should not be taken as such. I have not commented on that matter. This is a reaction to Dave's question "Where is the usage policy?" I think we should have one, so I have proposed one.
Q. Does London.pm really have a problem with harassment?
London.pm and the Perl community, compared to the vast majority of Programming and technology communities, is very progressive and a non-offensive place to be. The Perl community and the Perl programming language has and continues to have significant contributions from statistically more diverse range of individuals than the norm in the community industry and London.pm has. I am proud to be part of London.pm and would, without hesitation, recommend it to anyone regardless of their gender, race or sexual orientation because I believe that giving us a chance they'll find that it's a welcoming place for everyone.
Q. Won't publishing a code of conduct indicate that there's a problem? That London.pm is the kind of place where such a conduct occurs?
I'm afraid, through no fault of its own, London.pm _already_ has that image to _outsiders_ that do not have experience of the community directly. This, sadly, is because IT communities at large have gained this reputation. No matter what London.pm is actually like, unless someone external can tell what the social conduct of the group is - which is what a code of conduct is a formal form of - they will assume, or at the very least fear, we are like any other IT community.
To be blunt: In my opinion if you're not seen actively as part of the solution then people will assume (rightly or wrongly) that you're complicit with the problem. While self-policing without a code of conduct may in fact work well, it cannot be observed external to the community. A published code of conduct can.
Q. If this is a set of _rules_ won't it simply encourage people to game the rules? Wouldn't we be better off with what we have now (i.e. a pretty self policing community with a benevolent dictator that won't put up with bad behaviour)
Firstly, I've not stated a set of rules, I've stated a code of conduct. While some people may quibble the semantic differences between the two I'll hope you'll agree that the latter is a lot closer to simply codifying the social expectations that we already have in place.
Secondly, I'm not suggesting dismantling or replacing anything that we have already. There's nothing in this code of conduct that seeks to limit or restrict the absolute authority of the London.pm leader to deal with anyone who, in their opinion, who is acting detrimentally to rest of the group in any way he or she feels fit. It's just writing down _some_ of what already happens.
Thirdly, it's been suggested that the long version invites people to argue that _their_ particular behaviour isn't boorish. Those people are going to argue anyway, be it the short version, long version, or just the current social conventions, because that's the kind of people they are.
Q. Do people really need to be told this?
The vast majority of people don't. However, the two groups of people that do are:
a) People who are worried that they might be victims of harassment. They need to be reassured - especially when they've only just joined the community and haven't had time to completely integrate and have full knowledge of it - that harassment won't be tolerated and they need to know the procedure to follow if they do have any problem.
b) People who have missed the social context (especially new people to the community.) We all know that we modify our behaviour depending on the social context we're in (we might act differently in the office than we do in the pub.) New members of the community can often mistake one social context for another and this can cause accidental offence to other members of the community. The code of conduct can help provide the social context to avoid this mistake (especially the one line version, "Don't be creepy. You know that guy, don't be that guy.".)
Q. Isn't the policy too long? Is anyone going to read that?
Probably not the majority of people, no (that's why I included the one line summary after all.) But people _will_ care we have one, and some people will want to have explicitly spelled out what kind of thing is a problem and what they can do if there is a problem.
So, any further questions?
london.pm mailing list
london.pm at london.pm.org
End of london.pm Digest, Vol 82, Issue 27
More information about the london.pm