robert at se71.org
Wed Mar 1 13:10:26 GMT 2006
David Cantrell wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:35:59PM +0000, Paul Orrock wrote:
>>Roger Burton West wrote:
>>>So, Nildram's weaselling, Zen is too...
>I'm curious what Nildram have done to annoy other people too. I know
>what they've done to annoy me, but it's nowt to do with bandwidth caps.
>Their IP service delivery is still excellent.
I just don't like my Ts&Cs being altered. I bought unlimited broadband
from Nildram, and now I don't have it. I wasn't given a choice in giving
I don't use it, my downloads are currently very small, but if I decided
I wanted to try every current Linux distribution on some new hardware, I
now know I'd probably get told off, or have my account terminated, for
downloading all the CD images. Or if I wanted leave Second Life on
constantly, from the looks of my wireless card LED, that's a bit of a
bandwidth hog, I might also fall foul. I'm happy for slow broadband,
1Mbps is fine, I just want no limitations.
I just like having redundancy in my systems in case I want it. I have
two BT phone lines, one has no phone attached, it's just a backup. I
have two laptops. I have enough spare computer components to build a new
PC if I needed one, though I already have three working ones at home
already. My mobile phone contract gives me 350 free minutes a month, I
think I use less than 40 most months. Err, enough on the redundancy
argument I think :-)
More information about the london.pm