What a shame... [Wasn't:What shame?]
pawciobiel at gmail.com
Tue Oct 24 20:48:00 BST 2006
Pedro Figueiredo wrote:
> On 23 Oct 2006, at 22:32, ben at bpfh.net wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 07:04:43PM +0100, Pedro Figueiredo wrote:
>>> On 23 Oct 2006, at 16:22, Luis Motta Campos wrote:
>>>> eventually they will need to
>>>> rewrite everything to become (more) compatible with the Real World
>>> i believe they just did. 94% of the real world (tm) runs windows.
Almost 100 units in my university is on Suse, hope that they would do it
again if it won't work.
> i don't argue with that, i argue against the belief that the real world
> (tm) is composed of hackers running unix.
hmm... there is nothing to argue, everybody already know that this is
> furthermore, from a business point of view, windows media is the
> cheapest to serve (quality/bandwidth),
Is it? I don't know much about it so hope you don't mind me asking,
video.google and youtube is based the same technology?
> so i'm happy they're not
> squandering my license money on crack-fueled hippy-approved half-baked
o! I always thought that M$ is serving that type of solutions.
Must of being wrong then.
> especially when everyone can view windows media.
You haven't missed the point, have you?
BTW: You don't benefits from this whole BBC - M$ thing, do you?
FreeBSD The Power to Serve
More information about the london.pm