jns at gellyfish.com
Mon Apr 7 07:18:04 BST 2008
On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 23:45 +0100, Iain Barnett wrote:
> On 6 Apr 2008, at 9:13 pm, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > So we have perlbuzz.org, perl.org *and* perlfoundation.org. Maybe
> > this is part
> > of the problem.
> On 6 Apr 2008, at 10:13 pm, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
> > And another interesting initiative:
> > http://perlbuzz.com/2008/04/rethinking-the-interface-to-cpan.html.
> That is a very interesting link.
> Personally, I'm all for making CPAN a RESTful interface and then I
> could run my own GUI over the top, and kill the 90's visuals. I don't
> see a problem with having many sites, just the fact that all the
> current sites look like they still get most of their traffic through
> Gopher. What is (not) going on with PerlMonks?????! 
> On 6 Apr 2008, at 9:24 pm, Jonathan Tweed wrote:
> > But enough talking. What can we do about it? Will The Perl
> > Foundation pay for new sites? If not, why not?
> I'd also suggest:
That's an awful lot of work you just volunteered for.
More information about the london.pm