Perl's lack of 'in' keyword

Nigel Rantor wiggly at
Wed Oct 8 16:23:49 BST 2008

Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> On 8 Oct 2008, at 14:51, Nigel Rantor <wiggly at> wrote:
>> If anyone comes back and tell me that they think ~~ scans nicely in 
>> english
> Considering your email address I would have thought you would be very
> much in favour of ~~ and have a good way of pronouncing it....


Good work fella. You're right, I just wanted to retain the possibility 
of using ~~ for my own nefarious ends in a yet-to-be-written Perl source 
filter *cue evil laughter*

Although, if people are going to start calling it the "wiggly" operator 
that wouldn't be too bad either. B-)

More information about the mailing list